HARP 2.0

Are you paying your mortgage as agreed?  Nobody offered you any help to get a lower rate because you owe more than your home is worth?Now there is something for you to consider.

Changes to the existing HARP program, effective March 19th, will allow more underwater homeowners who have been paying their mortgage as agreed to refinance to either a lower rate, a shorter term, or from an ARM to a fixed product.  We will be looking at market rates or mighty close to them for this program.

 

  • No loan to value cap
  • Loan must be owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (by May 31, 2009)
  • Must be current on mortgage, no late payment in the previous 6 months, no more than 1×30 in the last 12 months
  • Refinance improves the long-term affordability or stability of the loan
  • If new loan payment is not 20% or more than current payment, specific income and credit guidelines do not apply
  • Recent BK or Foreclosure will not automatically disqualify the borrower
  • Owner occupied, 2nd homes, and investment properties eligible
  • Lender must show borrower benefit
    • Reduce monthly payment
    • Change from ARM to Fixed
    • Reduce interest rate
    • Reduce term
    • Relaxed condo requirements
    • Current loan to value must be greater than 80%
    • Loan was not refinanced under HARP previously (if previous HARP and was completed March-May 2009 can still be considered)

I am accepting inquiries and applications for this program now.  I will be able to submit to underwriting beginning March 12th for Freddie Mac loans and March 19th for Fannie Mae loans.

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2012 John Paul Mulchay
Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

**UPDATE-FHA monthly premium change

**UPDATE–It appears that HUD/FHA will be grandfathering in the .55 monthly mortgage insurance premium for FHA loans that were originated prior to June 1st, 2009.  Although any housing relief is welcome, I believe that many of the affected homeowners have already refinanced or left their homes.  I see many homeowners that have purchased homes after this date who are unable to refinance to a lower rate due to the subsequent increases in the FHA monthly mortgage insurance premium.

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2012 John Paul Mulchay
Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

FHA Mortgage Insurance Premiums to Increase

HUD has published a press release stating that FHA loans are going to get more expensive starting April 1, 2012. For case numbers pulled after this date, the Upfront Mortgage Insurance Premium will increase from 1% to 1.75%. Many homeowners finance this premium into their loan amount and HUD does not expect the change to impact otherwise qualified homebuyers. On a $150,000 purchase price, the increase amounts to just over $5 per month.

Another change mentioned in the press release addresses an expected increase to the monthly Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP). The change to the monthly premium is a result of the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 which requires FHA to increase the annual MIP it collects by 0.10 percent. The change to the monthly MIP will have a more noticeable effect on home buyers as the monthly increase on a $150,000 purchase is just over $12 per month.

None of this should be a deal breaker for most prospective home buyers although any increase to the cost of housing feels unwelcome. Regardless of how this may affect your clients, I feel that it is important information to make you aware of so that you can continue to provide value to them in multiple ways.

The Mortgagee letter to be released shortly by HUD will further illustrate the changes and the rationale behind them. Please let me know if you would like for me to forward this letter once it has been released. Here is the link to the press release: http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2012/HUDNo.12-037

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2012 John Paul Mulchay
Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Short Sale v. Foreclosure

We are again honored to have Christopher Reale, Director of Short Sale Operations at Lepizzera and Laprocina Title and Escrow Services, as today’s guest blogger. He is an expert on the short sale process and will share his knowledge with us on a regular basis. – The KCM Crew

Today’s ever changing real estate industry has brought upon some very challenging questions from our clients. We as counselors, want to put forth the best, non-emotional advice that we can, in hopes that we can help our clients and their families navigate the rough waters of the short sale process.

The most prevalent question and one that continues to permeate the industry is:

“Why should a seller go through the short sale process rather than letting their house be foreclosed upon?” 

While we cannot speak to every client circumstance, we can say one thing with complete conviction.  In almost all instances in which a potential seller is contemplating whether they should short sell their house or let it go through the foreclosure process, a short sale is the better option. The following are examples to consider:

Example A- Short Sale

Mr. Smith owns a home in which he has a mortgage balance of $220,000 and a current market value of $150,000. Mr. Smith has elected to short sell his property. His Realtor successfully obtains a buyer who puts forth an offer price of $120,000 (80% current market value according to Realty Trac Foreclosure Report 5/26/2011). After reviewing the buyers offer and the financial hardship information from Mr. Smith, Mr Smith’s bank agrees to accept the short payoff of $120,000 which would leave a deficiency balance of $100,000.

The transaction closes and is final.  Mr. Smith then pulls his credit report 30 days after the transaction takes place. On the report he notices that the mortgage trade line states “Mortgage debt was settled for less than full” and the balance on the mortgage is $0.  Mr. Smith is now on the road to financial recovery.

Example B- Foreclosure

For the ease of illustration we will use the same value and mortgage debt amounts as in Example A. However, Mr. Smith has elected to forgo the short sale process and let the bank foreclose on the property.  The bank holding his mortgage facilitates the proper legal procedures to foreclose on the property, all of which are costly.  Mr. Smith is notified and his property foreclosed upon of which is taken back by the bank to sell as an REO.

Six months later, the bank finally sells Mr. Smith’s home only they sell it for $90,000 (60% of current market value according to Realty Trac Foreclosure report dated 5/26/2011). Remember, as a short sale, the home would have sold for $120,000 keeping the deficiency to $100,000. In addition to the deficiency now being $130,000, the bank has elected to add on legal costs of $15,000 and asset preservation costs of another $5000 for a total deficiency liability of $150,000. Mr. Smith pulls his credit report 30 days after being notified that the bank has sold his property and of his liability.

On the report he notices that the mortgage trade line states “Foreclosure” and the balance is $150,000. Because of Mr Smith’s choice to choose foreclosure vs. short sale his road to financial recovery has taken a major detour. He not only has a foreclosure on his credit report but know has a much larger deficiency balance in which the bank, in most cases, will report on his credit report as a balance owed.

The Best Option is Clear

While the financial and credit advantages are clear when choosing a short sale over a foreclosure, other advantages are sometimes overlooked. The most important of all of them is maintaining the seller’s dignity and peace of mind. We have heard too many stories of families having to leave their homes because of a Sheriff’s order or some other type of legal action. The short sale process alleviates this negative social impact. The process puts the control back in the seller’s hands so that they can get back on the road to financial recovery and start providing for their families. In the battle of the two evils, a short sale always wins!!!

Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Tax Return Filing & Your Home Loan

Over the past couple of weeks I have had three clients with 2010 tax returns that were not filed in April. Normally, filing for an extension and sending in the tax return later is not such a big deal. It does, however, become an issue when one is trying to purchase a home. An otherwise well-qualified buyer can jeopardize the entire transaction just because the tax return has been recently filed with the IRS.

Let me explain.

I request a pretty substantial amount of paperwork to properly evaluate the financial position of my clients and to determine if we will have success getting through the underwriting process to secure a home loan. The most recent two years’ tax returns are a part of the paperwork that I review to derive accurate income. Once the buyer gets into contract for a new home and the file is submitted to underwriting, then the underwriter requests a tax transcript directly from the IRS. The transcript is compared to the tax returns provided by the home buyer and if they do not match, we have a big problem.

What makes matters more complicated is that it will take the IRS between 6-12 weeks to process the tax return once filed. Since a real estate purchase contract is commonly written for a 30 day close, it is imperative that tax returns be filed far enough in advance of shopping for a home to take this delay into consideration. There is not any way to ‘rush’ the IRS and most sellers are unwilling to wait an additional month or two while the buyer is waiting for their tax paperwork to come through.

Keep in mind this same scenario applies to amended returns. One client of mine amended her return prior to shopping for a home. I explained the process of verifying tax transcripts and emphasized sending the amended return to the IRS immediately. Unfortunately, it appears that the client did not do so and because the tax returns submitted for the loan did not match the IRS transcripts, her loan was denied. The underwriter was not comfortable with the borrower filing an amended return after applying for a home loan. She stated that it looked like the buyer was changing her tax return (income) on paper for the sole purpose of obtaining a loan. The underwriter also stated that formally, this was mortgage fraud since the client submitted amended tax returns showing different income than what was filed with the IRS. The borrower was lucky that the loan was only denied and no further action was pursued.

I cannot stress enough the importance of working with a seasoned professional when applying for your home loan. Once you find the person that you are comfortable working with, please listen and take their advice. It is, after all, what you are paying for. Your loan originator wants nothing more than to see your smiling face with a new set of keys in your hand.

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 John Paul Mulchay
Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Do You Really Need to Hire a Realtor?

This blog prides itself on the quality of real estate information we deliver each and every day. We try to gather empirical evidence to validate the positions we take. We do not use just an anecdotal story to make a point. We also do not get caught up in the sensationalism of the moment. However, today will be different.

We can’t resist commenting on the story which recently appeared in the Wall Street Journal regarding Colby Sambrotto, the founder and former CEO of forsalebyowner.com. It seems the founding father and lifelong evangelist of the concept of selling your home without a real estate agent was forced to hire a broker to sell his home after failing at what he preaches others should do.

After failing to sell his NYC apartment on his own as a For Sale By Owner (FSBO), Sambrotto hired a broker and paid a 6% commission in order to get the job done. His personal experience helps refute some of the myths Sambrotto has been espousing for over a decade. Let’s look at two of those myths:

Myth #1 – You Will Pocket More Money Selling on Your Own

Most FSBO sites say you can save the commission by selling on your own. What happened in Sambrotto’s sale?

From the WSJ article:

“The broker, Jesse Buckler, said he told Mr. Sambrotto the apartment in the Lion’s Head building on West 19th Street near Sixth Avenue was priced too low and wasn’t drawing the right buyers.

By May, it went into contract, he said, after attracting multiple offers. It closed in the last few days for $150,000 more than the original asking price.”

Myth #2 – The Internet Alone Can Sell Your Home

Many have said that, with the introduction of home search on the internet, hiring an agent is no longer a necessity. What happened to the FSBO guru when he attempted to only depend on the internet?

From the WSJ article:

“Looking to move his family to the suburbs, [Mr. Sambrotto] said he carefully staged his apartment for sale himself, and put it on the market. But after using a mix of websites to publicize his apartment, he said he had only ‘middling success’ and switched to a broker because many buyers were so reliant on brokers.”

Bottom Line

There is a reason the real estate industry has been around for centuries: it performs a valuable service.

Special thanks to the KCM Crew for use of their content.

Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Why buy now?

Despite what appears to be a non-stop wave of tough news regarding real estate, four major media players have come out this month with the same advice: It Is Time to Buy a Home! Here are the four articles and a breakdown as to why the advice makes sense.

The Wall Street Journal: Why It’s Time to Buy

CBS Money Watch: Why the Time to Buy is Now

Forbes Magazine: 9 Reasons to Buy a House Now

National Public Radio: For Many, It’s Still a Good Time to Buy a Home

With prices continuing to depreciate in most regions of the country, some may wonder why these four entities are suggesting to their readership that now is the time to buy. Each organization realizes that PRICE is not as important as COST. The cost of a home can go up even if prices continue to fall. Unless you are an all cash buyer, you must take into consideration the expense of mortgaging when calculating the full cost of a home. Here is some information to consider.

Interest Rates

Currently, interest rates sit at historic lows. However, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, PMI and the National Association of Realtors are all projecting approximately a 1% increase in mortgage rates over the next year. A one percent increase in rate negates a ten percent fall in prices.

Lending Standards

The government has proposed a tightening of lending standards called Quality Residential Mortgage (QRM). If accepted as proposed two things will happen:

The qualification process for loans will become more difficult
The cost of a loan will increase
Bottom Line

There is a reason more and more financial organizations are suggesting to their followers that now is the time to buy a home: because the cost of purchasing a home is about to increase (even if prices continue to fall).

courtesy of THE KCM CREW on JUNE 14, 2011

Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Las Vegas High Rise Financing (condotels too)

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 John Paul Mulchay
Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Free Community Workshop, How to Pay your Mortgage in full in 12 years

How to pay your mortgage off in 12 years

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 John Paul Mulchay
Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged | Leave a comment

National Licensing for Loan Originators—but not ALL of them?

With the implosion of the real estate market across the country, the government funding of Big Banking, and a whole lot of finger pointing as to who was to blame, new regulations have been imposed in an attempt to keep another such catastrophe from happening in the future.

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act was passed in 2008 with two pieces of this legislation directly impacting residential mortgage loan origination:   NMLS (Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System) and the SAFE (Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing) Act.

The NMLS requires that Mortgage Loan Originators submit fingerprints for an FBI background check, pass the National and State exams to illustrate proficiency in their profession, and complete 20 hours of approved education covering Federal law, ethics, lending standards, mortgage products, consumer protection, fraud, and fair lending.  Annual continuing education covering similar topics must also be completed.  I fully support these changes and requirements.

Even after successfully originating loans for the last 9 years, I had to take classes (not cheap) and time away from my clients to prepare for these tests.  I passed both exams at the first seating and I am grateful to have had the opportunity to further refine my knowledge base.  For the record, fully 30% of loan originators do NOT pass the National exam on the first try and must wait 30 days to reattempt the test.

Interestingly, if you work for a Federally Insured bank, you do not need to do any of this. No National test, no fingerprints, no State test.  Is it me, or does that seem like it is not ‘secure and fair?’  It appears that the best in the industry will be those working for Mortgage Brokers.  Clearly those who are unable to pass these exams or are unwilling to put in the time and money to gain the basic knowledge required by the mortgage industry to represent their clients could just go work for a bank…Maybe because of the testing or maybe because of the background check.

Bottom line is the consumer should be aware of these differences and should know who they are working with to assist them with financing one of the biggest purchases of their lives.  NMLS and the SAFE Act ensure that mortgage brokers have more education than those who work at banks.

Here is the consumer access page to research your mortgage professional.  Are they listed?

http://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org/

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2010 John Paul Mulchay
Share
Posted in Real Estate Finance | Tagged | Leave a comment